This is a independent community website for shareholders and does not represent Forest Park Mutual Water Company in any way.
About Save Forest Park Mutual Water
Our Mission
Save Forest Park Mutual Water is dedicated to preserving and protecting our natural water resource. Our mission is to ensure our neighborhoods most precious natural resource is protected from outside forces, who wish to turn it into a commodity through volumetric pricing, turning shareholders into customers, driving up rates while driving neighbors out, all the while exposing the neighborhood to more RF radiation through "cellular gateway" devices, that are soon to be installed and connected to the newly installed neighborhood RF radiating smart meters. Yes, the board plans on installing "gateways", adding more RF radiation throughout the neighborhood, nothing better then living in a mountain canyon where the streets are lined with RF radiating smart meters, while a few RF radiating cellular gateways on poles beam us from above, sounds healthy.
Keeping our most precious natural resource in local hands
Our Pure Water
Our pure clean water is such a precious natural neighborhood resource. Take the time to read about "stakeholder governance", a clever way big money interests, convince small rural communities, to slowly turn over control of natural resources to their big moneyed friends, known as "stakeholders", who impose their will on shareholders, us, forcing commoditization of a natural resource under the guise of conservation, misleading rural communities with clever buzz words or terms such as "ESG" or "Beyond Compliance", the latter being a term our Board has already begun using on their website, the Board has since removed it, it was brought to you by corporate think tanks. You can read where the term "Beyond Compliance" comes from here
https://www.weforum.org/publications/beyond-compliance-embedding-impact-through-innovative-finance/
or here
or read about stakeholder governance below
https://financialpost.com/opinion/terence-corcoran-the-murky-rise-of-stakeholder-capitalism
or take the time to watch " Blue Gold; World Water Wars"
https://youtu.be/q49_c70O6LM?si=S_YIl_rAAvZymQTI
if you have even more time, read about the dangers of "cellular radiation", scientifically called "radio frequency radiation" below, our families including our children will soon be exposed to more of this kind of radiation, in our narrow canyon neighborhood.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935122023659
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29655646/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28504324/
https://ehtrust.org/cell-phoneswireless__trashed/cell-phones/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1538544223000238
https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-021-00768-1
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935118303475
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935118300045
My conversation with AI on the subject. After catching AI up, I asked AI
"Are there valid concerns especially since we live in a narrow canyon community?"
Thought for 30s
"Yes, there are valid concerns about RF radiation from cellular gateway devices like Metron Farnier’s Innov8-VN and VN Gateway in a narrow canyon community such as Forest Falls, California. The unique geography of narrow canyons—characterized by steep walls, dense foliage, and rugged terrain—can amplify RF exposure risks in ways that differ from flat, urban, or open rural areas. Below, I’ll outline the key factors making these concerns legitimate, drawing from scientific insights, regulatory guidelines, and environmental considerations. This assessment builds on prior discussions about low-level RF effects (e.g., Ramazzini and NTP studies) while focusing on canyon-specific dynamics.
1. Signal Challenges in Canyons Leading to Higher Device Transmit Power
Poor Coverage and Dead Zones: Narrow canyons like those in Forest Falls often create "dead zones" where cellular signals are obstructed by mountains, trees, boulders, or canyon walls. This terrain blocks line-of-sight to cell towers, reducing signal strength and forcing devices to work harder to connect. In such areas, LTE Cat-M/Cat 1 devices (like the Innov8-VN) may automatically ramp up transmit power to their maximum (up to 23–26 dBm or 200–400 mW) to maintain connectivity, especially during daily data transmissions. This increases local RF radiation from the device itself, as opposed to lower power in strong-signal areas.
Why This Matters for Health: Higher transmit power elevates nearby RF exposure, potentially exacerbating non-thermal effects like those in the Ramazzini study (increased tumor risks at low levels) or NTP findings (heart and brain tumors in rats). In a community setting, this could mean higher cumulative exposure for residents, particularly children, whose tissues absorb more RF.
Canyon-Specific Evidence: Studies on urban canyons (analogous to natural ones) show that dense environments require network densification (more base stations or boosters), which can increase overall RF pollution. In natural canyons, signal boosters or external antennas (optional on Innov8-VN) might be used to overcome barriers, further boosting RF output.
2. Multipath Propagation and RF Hotspots
Signal Reflection Off Canyon Walls: RF waves in canyons can bounce off rock faces and vegetation, creating multipath interference where signals overlap and intensify in certain spots (e.g., "hotspots" with higher power density). This is similar to urban "street canyons" where reflections amplify exposure, but in natural settings like Forest Falls, it could be worsened by echoes in narrow valleys.
Health Implications: These hotspots might exceed average exposure estimates (e.g., >0.008 mW/cm² at close range), potentially aligning with levels in studies showing biological effects like blood pressure changes or sleep disturbances. For a small community, where homes are clustered along canyon floors, this could mean uneven but elevated RF fields near meter pits.
Lack of Specific Studies: While no direct research on Forest Falls exists, general canyon signal challenges (e.g., in mountainous California areas) highlight increased RF variability, supporting precautionary concerns.
3. Cumulative Exposure in a Compact Community
Density and Proximity: In narrow canyons, homes and meters are often close together due to limited buildable space, leading to overlapping RF fields from multiple gateways. Even with low individual outputs (intermittent transmissions), the aggregate effect could mimic denser urban RF environments, where studies suggest increased pollution from network densification.
Vulnerable Populations: Children and sensitive individuals (e.g., those reporting headaches or insomnia from smart meters) face heightened risks in such settings, as canyon geography limits escape from ambient RF. California’s CCST report on smart meter RF acknowledges potential health impacts, though it deems them low—critics argue it underestimates chronic exposure in varied terrains.
Environmental Factors: Heavy rain, fog, or foliage in canyons can further degrade signals, prompting devices to transmit more frequently or at higher power, compounding exposure.
4. Regulatory and Community Gaps
Outdated Guidelines: FCC limits (e.g., 0.47–1 mW/cm²) don’t fully account for non-thermal effects or terrain-specific variations, as noted in critiques of cell tower safety. In canyons, where signals are unpredictable, standard compliance testing may not capture real-world hotspots.
Lack of Local Data: No specific RF studies or complaints were found for Forest Falls smart meters, but statewide concerns (e.g., PG&E removals due to health effects) mirror your situation. This absence of tailored assessments validates calls for independent testing.
Broader Context: IARC’s “possibly carcinogenic” classification for RF applies here, with canyon geography potentially elevating low-level risks cited in Berkeley research (e.g., brain cancer links).
Are These Concerns Valid? Yes, and Here's Why
Absolutely—these are not unfounded worries but grounded in how canyon topography interacts with RF technology. While individual device emissions remain low and compliant, the geography can lead to higher effective exposure through increased power, reflections, and accumulation. This is especially pertinent in small communities like yours, where alternatives (e.g., non-cellular metering) could mitigate risks without sacrificing functionality. Studies like NTP and Ramazzini underscore the need for caution, particularly for long-term residents and children".
End of AI Answer
The Perfectionist Fallacy
The Board loves making "appeals to perfection" with comments like, "you have a cell phone" or "what about your wifi box" , both classic fallacious appeals to perfection, just because we have allowed one bee to sting us, doesn't mean we have to allow all bees to sting us, nor do we have to allow the Boards bees to sting our families. I personally don't want my children to be stung at all, when there are other viable options available to get the same desired results. There are other ways to record how much water each household uses, that doesn't require lining our streets with RF radiating devices and towers, still staying compliant with California mandates. In fact, a bunch of other small water companies prefer these options and so do I.
Board News
From the latest water board meeting
Well unfortunately it does not look like things are going to get better anytime soon. The Board is now currently looking to remove shareholders access to the courts. Yes, the Board is planning on passing a new arbitration bylaw, which essentially strips shareholders access to the courts, rather then give my opinion on why shareholders should strongly oppose this, I'll leave you with the opinion of the Standford Business School.
https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/why-binding-arbitration-game-rigged-against-customers
The vote will be taken at the annual shareholders meeting and will be voted on by the members.
The Lawsuit and What's Really Going On?
Second Amended Complaint filed in San Bernardino County Court
I wont say much about the lawsuit, it was not filed for monetary gain, like some believe.To anybody interested you can read it from the San Bernardino County Civil Court website, where all documents concerning this case are publicly available under case # Civsb2427211. The reason the lawsuit was filed can be found under the document titled "Second Amended Complaint". If you take the time to read it, you'll see that my family asked the Board if we could pay to install our own meter, that didn't invade our homes privacy, as noted in the March 5, 2024 meeting minutes describe, under 4 B. third bullet point down, the Board said no, so we took our neighborhood company to court, to ask the court to compel the company to allow us to put on a less invasive meter and the Board called our neighborhood companies attorneys. That's what this lawsuit is about, we just want a less invasive meter, that we are willing to pay all costs for. We value our solitude and hold there are no California mandates that state the inside of our homes must be monitored, the way these water meters do, as referenced in the March 5, 2024 Board meeting minutes.
What's really going on?
Finally, this site is not meant to disparage the Board in any way, shape, or form. My family and I are truly grateful for all the Boards time and effort ensuring our homes water continues to flow. This site is merely my attempt at greater transparency concerning the decisions being made and where the neighborhood water company seems to be headed, by all appearances our water company is transitioning from a "shareholder model" to a "stakeholder model", a model developed by R. Edward Freeman and pushed heavily by Klaus Schwab, son of a Nazi munitions supplier, in partnership with all the leading banks to include the big hedge funds, I'm sure you've heard of the World Economic Forum, it's their model and I believe it should be actively fought. The "stakeholder governance model" of running a corporation is nothing but a clever way, thru the ruse of conservation, convenience, and infrastructure, big moneyed interest use to insert themselves into a small rural corporations interests, to control and manage a resource thru pricing, the reasons why they do this is a little more complicated to explain and would take about five more pages of foundational prep, so I'll leave it for another time. Moreover, this transformation from "shareholder governance" to "stakeholder governance" doesn't happen all at once, the takeover is slow and methodical, but mark my words, it's happening, consequently, if we don't course correct, we will have "stakeholder governance" and will be governed by people who don't live in our neighborhood. They will control all of our families precious water, to include the price of it, think "boiling frog" metaphor. In closing, I'll give a brief synopsis of how it starts and ends. First, the corporate lobbyists approach the Boards with grant incentives from the state for doing certain things. Next, the Board tries to meet those goals, which is why eventually we will have volumetric pricing, the more expensive water is, the less you will use, the easier for the Board to meet their goals of sustainability and get the grant. However, the big pay off comes when there is excess water, which allows the Board to sell it to the state, I'm not saying the Board plans on doing that. This is a simplified version of course, of how organizations like the WEF operate through state govts. The sneaky part is, those same lobbyists who approached the Board, approached the state to fund those grants, so that the politicians who work for corporate groups like the WEF, now have access to the water. The state now funneling the water back to the corporate donors at a reduced rate for their own projects, to use how they see fit, this is all done under the guise of conservation, we conserve, so the corporations can use. I'm trying to be as clear as possible, this is not a Board thing, although I think certain Board members are aware, but this is more of a state government thing. The state through these programs are quietly implementing the transition to stakeholder governance. Just type in any California Govt. leaders name and World Economic Forum and you will see what I mean. All of the states goals, are the same as World Economic Forums goals, it needs to be guarded against.
Trust Us, Were Your Neighbors
We all just went through the "meter project", where multiple board members, who were in the process of selling their homes and surrendering their shares, voted on the "meter project" and immediately moved, leaving us neighborhood shareholders with the consequences, that include invasive smart meters, (for reference on how insanely invasive these meters are on home privacy, look at the March 5, 2024 meeting minutes under 4. B third bullet point down on the FPMWC website) and RF radiating "gateways". In my opinion this type of behavior is ethically inappropriate for any corporation, despite its size, and the bylaws as they stand are wholly inadequate to stop it.The only way to prevent a recurrence of this behavior is by neighborhood shareholders getting involved and making the necessary changes to the bylaws. We are a neighborhood company. However, in my opinion if shareholders don't get actively involved we will be dictated to by outside forces and that will be the sad end of our neighborhoods little water company. Please remember, our current Board has consistently told us, they didn't install "smart meters", you can refer to "meter questions and answers" document on the company website, where they specifically state, they did not install smart meters and they continue to tell us this, the link below is my retort. Go outside and take a look at your meter and then hit the link, please don't dismiss your lying eyes. We are in the pot!
https://metron-us.com/smart-water-meters/
Rumors and Realities
Reports from the mill
Since the meter project was announced, the rumor mill hasnt stopped. I for one was livid and wrote certain emails, I'm am not the proudest of. However, I never threatened violence or any such thing but I can have a sharp tongue and if I offended anyone verbally, I apologize. What is going on now, things I'm hearing from the mill are insane, I have received reports from others, I will not name names, that me and my family should be careful, we don't know who were messing with, as well as a few other situations, that I won't go into. I have heard reports of people carrying guns, people being threatened with arrest, people being trespassed, people threatened that they will be thrown off the mountain, people roaming around the tanks at night and all manner of craziness. How much of it is true, I have no idea. However, I want to state categorically, my family and wife have nothing to do with what I write, they are not responsible for what I write. I am solely responsible for my words, I hope that we as a company can work things out, so we have a peaceful neighborhood again. However, if for some reason certain people just can't find it in there hearts to work these things out rationally, I am 47, 6 foot, brown hair, brown eyes, bearded, a lumbering gait and need to exercise, at least my wife keeps telling me that. I don't say this out of bravado, my tough guy days are long over. I say this with a persistent worry that someone will approach my older sons thinking its me, again they have nothing to do with my words. I don't even think they realize what is really even going on. However, one day when our modest home is passed down to them and they and my grandchildren are drinking our truly delicious water, from a company they are a part of, with their neighbors, they'll get it.
OUR REALITIES
The realities are, the Board fenced off company property from shareholders, who won't be allowed entry without receiving prior permission, then installed smart meters, which can be accessed anywhere in world through the waterscope app, then passed zoom call bylaws for meetings, allowing Board Members to attend even when living outside the service area and now the Board wants to strip shareholders right to access the courts to seek relief. There are no bylaws that state a Board members primary residence must be in the neighborhood to be on the Board, this is a huge problem. In my estimation, its quite obvious what's happening here. Oh, I'll make one final prediction, we should all be receiving emails or visits any day now about our water usage, although it could be a little longer, I'm not totally sure the Board has all the infrastructure set up yet or all our email addresses. You will be contacted about your water usage. Anyways, I really hope shareholders get involved, I do not believe anything happening is for the good of the neighborhood or for conservation, despite the Board, Klaus Schwab and rich hedge funds of the WEF telling me it is.
Disclaimer All opinions contained in this website are the sole opinions of its author and should not be taken as facts, the author hopes every shareholder will do their due diligence to familiarize themselves with the subjects above and draw their own conclusions.
From the Website Author
